Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238854›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Unlocking innovation: the dynamics of user engagement in an open-source 3D printer community.

Alysia Garmulewicz, Nicholas Sabin, Felix Reed-Tsochas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alysia GarmulewiczSaïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-5809
Nicholas SabinSaïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6702-976X
Felix Reed-TsochasSaïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

User innovation lies at the core of a growing body of research, with a predominant focus on how individual user attributes can be associated with observed contributions to innovation. However, framing user innovation in terms of individual attributes risks neglecting important changes in behavior at the individual and community level over time. Here, our focus is on how the time that individual users spend in that community relates to innovation outcomes. We study innovation in a firm-hosted online user community for a 3D printer company, marked by their commitment to open-source hardware. We analyze a unique longitudinal dataset of 38,277 observations recording user posts to an open-access user forum from October 2011 to March 2015. We find that time spent in a user community is positively associated with contributions to innovation, as users migrate from identifying problems and needs, to contributing innovation-related modifications and hacks. Our finding emphasizes the value of user retention in open-source communities as our analysis shows that typical users can add value to firms' innovation activities over time. Our focus on open-hardware complements many existing studies on open-source software and advances our understanding of open innovation more generally.

Indexed as

InventionsPrinting, Three-DimensionalHumans

Identifiers

PMID40238854
PMCPMC12002529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.