Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Perceptual judgments are resistant to the advisor's perceived level of trustworthiness: A deep fake approach.

Mathias Van der Biest, Sam Verschooren, Frederick Verbruggen, Marcel Brass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathias Van der BiestDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-4767
Sam VerschoorenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6391-9861
Frederick VerbruggenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-0719
Marcel BrassDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3364-4019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As we navigate our environment, we frequently make spontaneous judgments about other's characteristics. Trustworthiness is a particularly important trait, often judged instantly and used to guide decisions, especially in uncertain situations. Although the impact of trustworthiness on social behaviour is well-documented, its influence on more fundamental cognitive processes, such as perceptual decision-making, remains unclear. The present study aims to fill this gap. In the first experiment (N =  100), we validated a new trustworthiness manipulation by applying deep fake technology to create animated versions of perceptually trustworthy, untrustworthy, and neutral static computer-generated faces. In the second experiment (N =  199), the deep fake procedure was applied to a new set of trustworthy and untrustworthy faces that served as advisors during a perceptual decision-making task. Here participants had to indicate the direction of dots that were either moving coherently to the left or the right (i.e., random dot motion task). Contrary to our predictions, participants did not align more with the advice of trustworthy advisors than that of untrustworthy advisors. While participants made faster decisions and reported greater confidence when aligning with the advice, these effects were not influenced by the advisor's perceived trustworthiness. We integrate our findings within theoretical frameworks of advice taking, domain specificity of facial trustworthiness, and task requirements.

Indexed as

JudgmentTrustAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40238842
PMCPMC12002497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.