ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Experiences of Canadian perinatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of open-ended survey responses.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Living with risk and uncertainty: a qualitative phenomenological study of women's pregnancy and postpartum experiences in Saskatchewan during COVID-19.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused significant socioeconomic and healthcare disruptions in Canada. COVID-19 healthcare policies and local infection rates varied considerably across Canada's geographically diverse, multijurisdictional healthcare system. Emergence of highly transmissible COVID-19 variants and widespread COVID-19 vaccination mandates in Fall 2021 further impacted life in Canada. The experiences of pregnant people, in particular, were challenged by COVID-19 outbreaks, Canadian hospital policies, and local public health restrictions.
objectiveThis study explored experiences of Canadian perinatal care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
designOnline, cross-sectional survey with qualitative analysis.
methodsIndividuals pregnant after January 1, 2020 who received perinatal care in Canada participated in our Pandemic Pregnancy Experiences eSurvey, September 1, 2021 to February 1, 2022. Open-ended survey responses were qualitatively evaluated by thematic and content analysis. Codes were identified both deductively and inductively, categorized using principles of woman-centered care, and developed into major and minor themes.
resultsPrenatal care and COVID-19 vaccination experiences were evaluated from 362 participants, with 234 participants also elaborating on their labor and delivery (L&D) care. Major themes organized by woman-centered care category as follows: Choice of Healthcare Provider (good quality healthcare provider, barriers to provider of choice), Autonomy-Healthcare (autonomy empowered, autonomy impacted), Choice of Delivery Place (wanted hospital birth, got hospital birth), Choice of Support Companion(s) (no support companion for prenatal appointments, hospital restrictions L&D support companion(s)), and, Autonomy-COVID-19 Vaccination (vaccinated while pregnant/breastfeeding).
conclusionsPregnancy and birth experiences were generally positive; however, both COVID-19 and existing constraints of provincial/territorial healthcare systems impacted Canadian perinatal experiences. Limited choice of healthcare provider type and access to prenatal and L&D support companion(s) affected perinatal care satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.