ArticlePloS one2025
Drivers of rodent community structure in an Urban National Park, Kenya.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nairobi National Park (NNP) is among Kenya's most vulnerable ecosystems, experiencing significant pressure from urbanization. Rodents, which are sensitive to environmental changes, are considered bioindicators of ecosystem health, and their population dynamics can be used to assess ecosystem pressures such as urbanization. This study assessed the rodent community structure in NNP to understand the effects of various urban pressures by examining the relationships between rodent diversity, richness, and abundance with vegetation types and metrics, seasonality, and habitat disturbances. The capture-mark-release method was used to trap rodents from 15 sites in Nairobi National Park's savannah, forest, and riverine vegetation types during the dry and wet seasons. The diversity, species richness and abundance were determined from the trappings. From 56 rodents trapped, five species were identified namely: Lemniscomys striatus, Hylomyscus sp, Rattus rattus, Mus mus and Otomys tropicalis. Rodent diversity at NNP was low (Simpson=0.7130; Shannon Weiner=1.40; Brillouin index=1.27) while Pielou's species evenness, was moderate=0.44 indicating near equity in species distribution. Univariate Generalised linear models showed that rodent abundance was influenced by season, vegetation type, and vegetation metrics. The multivariate model indicated that rodents were more abundant in the wet season compared to the dry season, and that abundance was also positively associated with increased tree and shrub densities. Rodent species richness was positively associated with higher tree density, while vegetation types influenced rodent species diversity. Rodent abundance was influenced by vegetation type, vegetation metrics (density and cover), and season. Human disturbance had no effect in both models. It was observed that the diverse anthropogenic activities occurring in NNP, do not significantly influence rodent abundance compared to the measured biotic and abiotic factors. This first rodent survey in this Park provides preliminary data for continued monitoring of this ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.