ArticlePloS one2025
Experimental study on the effect of Ivermectin on cattle dung faunas in Eastern Ethiopia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ivermectin in veterinary medicine: a narrative review of antiparasitic efficacy, resistance evolution, antiviral evidence, and One Health implications.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An experimental investigation was conducted from December 2023 to June 2024 at the beef farm of Haramaya University. The bulls were divided into two groups: one group received ivermectin treatment, while the other acted as a control. The SUMIVER brand of ivermectin was administered subcutaneously at 1 ml per 50 kg of body weight. Dung samples from both groups were collected and prepared for analysis at five-day intervals during the eighth sampling period. The results were measured, documented, and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. All data were entered and analyzed using an independent t-test with the STATA-14 software. In the qualitative assessment, no dipteran larvae or pupae were detected in the dung samples, except during the eighth round. However, various species of invertebrates were attracted to the freshly managed dung, resulting in a higher visitation rate in the control group compared to the experimental group. In the initial weeks of the study, the presence of ivermectin residues affected the dung beetle population. Conversely, the treated dung showed a significant infestation of termites. After several weeks, both groups of dung pats were invaded by ants, with the control group experiencing infestation first. These findings suggest that ivermectin residues released into the environment through cattle dung can influence negatively plant germination, dung fauna, and soil fertility. Therefore, it is crucial for veterinarians to be knowledgeable about the environmental side effects of ivermectin and to offer guidance to livestock owners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.