Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238771›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Task-sharing for non-communicable disease prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries in the context of health worker shortages: A systematic review.

Azeb Gebresilassie Tesema, Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Kanika Chaudhri, Anthony Sunjaya, Samuel Thio, Kenneth Yakubu, Ragavi Jeyakumar, Myron Godinho, Renu John, Mai Eltigany and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Azeb Gebresilassie TesemaSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-4499
Sikhumbuzo A MabundaSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Kanika ChaudhriThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-0769
Anthony SunjayaThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Samuel ThioSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0356-9251
Kenneth YakubuThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-0143
Ragavi JeyakumarSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Myron GodinhoWestmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.
Renu JohnThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-034X
Mai EltiganyWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Martyna HogendorfWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rohina JoshiSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health workers are pivotal for non-communicable disease (NCD) service delivery, yet often are unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is limited evidence on what NCD-related tasks non-physician health workers (NPHWs) can perform and their effectiveness. This study aims to understand how task-sharing is used to improve NCD prevention and control in LMICs. We also explored barriers, facilitators, and unexpected consequences of task-sharing. Databases searched in two phases and included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries, and references of included studies from inception until 31st July 2024. We included randomised control trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, and associated process evaluation and cost effectiveness studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool v2. PROSPERO: CRD42022315701. The study found 5527 citations, 427 full texts were screened and 149 studies (total population sample>432567) from 31 countries were included. Most studies were on tasks shared with nurses (n=83) and community health workers (n=65). Most studies focussed on cardiovascular disease (n=47), mental health (n=48), diabetes (n=27), cancer (n=20), and respiratory diseases (n=10). Seventeen studies included two or more conditions. Eighty-one percent (n=120) of studies reported at least one positive primary outcome, while 19 studies reported neutral results, one reported a negative result, eight (5.4%) reported mixed positive and neutral results, and one reported neutral and negative findings. Economic analyses indicated that task-sharing reduced total healthcare costs. Task-sharing is an effective intervention for NCDs in LMICs. It is essential to enhance the competencies and training of NPHWs, provide resources to augment their capabilities, and formalise their role in the health system and community. Optimising task-sharing for NCDs requires a holistic approach that strengthens health systems while supporting NPHWs in effectively addressing the diverse needs of their communities. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022315701.

Identifiers

PMID40238771
PMCPMC12002516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.