ArticlePloS one2025
An opinion evolution model for online social networks considering higher-order interactions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the number of users in online social networks increases, the diffusion of information and users' opinions on events become more complex, making it difficult for traditional complex networks to accurately capture their characteristics and patterns. To address this, this paper proposes an online social network opinion evolution model that accounts for higher-order interactions. The model incorporates the higher-order effects of group interactions and introduces the acceptance, non-commitment, and rejection dimensions from social judgment theory. Different approaches, such as acceptance, neutrality, and contrastive rejection, are adopted when individuals exchange opinions with their neighbors. Through numerical simulations, it is shown that higher-order interactions significantly enhance the speed and coverage of information propagation. When the interaction dimensions are appropriate, increasing the average size of hyperedges significantly contributes to the formation of consensus. In contrast, simply increasing the number of hyperedges that nodes are involved in has a limited impact on consensus formation. This work provides a theoretical and model-based foundation for better understanding the dynamics of opinion evolution in social networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.