ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Assessing Aquatic Readiness as a Health-Enhancing Measure in Young Swimmers with Physical Disabilities: The Revised Aquatic Independence Measure (AIM-2).
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Greek Translation and Preliminary Test-Retest Reliability of the AQUA CHILD Questionnaire in Children With Developmental Disabilities.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Impact of assistive tool-based training on anxiety, mental focus, and self-confidence among university swimming students.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Swimming for Children with Disability: Experiences of Rehabilitation and Swimming Professionals in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the well-established health outcomes associated with the aquatic environment, this study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Aquatic Independence Measure-Revised (AIM-2). The original scale comprised twenty-three skills, graded on a five-point proficiency scale. A sample of one hundred eight young swimmers with disabilities, who had completed at least two years of training, was assessed by their coaches, generating a dataset of four thousand nine hundred sixty-eight scores. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and internal consistency measures were applied to validate the scale's structure, resulting in the extraction of three factors accounting for sixty-four percent of the variance, based on thirteen original items. Two independent experts established interrater reliability in twenty-two participants. Additionally, divergent validity was examined across participants' years of swim-training experience across three disability severity categories, gender, and two age groups. Significant differences were found in skill acquisition based on years of experience and disability severity. The results indicate that the AIM-2 effectively assesses swimming readiness in young swimmers with disabilities. Coaches can use it to monitor progress, optimize training, and support the health benefits of aquatic activities for children and adolescents with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.