ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Association Between Census Tract-Level Poverty and Non-White Race with Location of Coal Ash Disposal Pits in the United States.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Externalizing behaviors in children living near coal-fired power plants.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coal ash is a byproduct of coal-fired power plants, and the management and disposal of coal ash in coal ash pits is an environmental health concern. Evidence suggests that socioeconomically disadvantaged communities are more likely to bear the burden of these environmental hazards. However, limited studies have investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status and residential proximity to coal ash pits. We examined associations between census tract poverty and non-white race with the likelihood of having coal ash pits within the census tract. We obtained coal ash pit location and census tract-level data (2017-2021) of the percentage of the population living at or below the federal poverty level and the percentage of the population's non-white race for 82,805 census tracts in the contiguous United States. We implemented multivariable logistic regression models to examine associations between non-white race, poverty, and the likelihood of having one or more coal ash pits in a census tract. Secondary analyses among tracts with at least one coal ash pit evaluated the associations between poverty, non-white race, and the likelihood of having multiple coal ash pits. Models additionally adjusted for census tract region. Census tracts in the highest quartile of poverty were over two times as likely to have one or more coal ash pits (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.52, 3.25). Tracts in the highest quartile of the non-white population had 90% lower odds of having one or more coal ash pits as compared to the lowest quartile (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.17). Census tracts with higher levels of poverty were more likely to have one or more coal ash pits, and census tracts with higher non-white populations were less likely to have one or more coal ash pits, suggesting that these associations are complex and indicate an environmental justice issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.