ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of Waste Trends in the European Union (2021-2023): Sectorial Contributions, Regional Differences, and Socio-Economic Factors.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valorization of Agri-Food Waste from Pigment-Rich Root Vegetable in Integrated EU Biorefinery Systems.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sectoral Analysis of Food Waste in EU Countries: Implications for Pro-Environmental Orientation and Policy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explaining Food Waste Dissimilarities in the European Union: An Analysis of Economic, Demographic, and Educational Dimensions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Food Safety in the European Union: A Comparative Assessment Based on RASFF Notifications, Pesticide Residues, and Food Waste Indicators.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food waste is a chronic and ongoing environmental, economic, and social problem in the European Union. The study will examine trends in food waste from 2021 to 2023, sectoral effects, regional heterogeneity, and socio-economic determinants of waste intensity. Interlinking longitudinal data from Statista and Eurostat, statistical modeling, and cluster analysis are employed by the study to uncover trends in food waste across member states in the EU. The research shows that domestic food wastage remains the leading one, accounting for 50-60% of the total food wastage in the EU. Inefficiencies in manufacturing and retail are identified as important drivers of wastage generation in high-waste nations such as Cyprus and Denmark because inefficiencies in the processes result in increased wastage generation. Spain and Croatia have continued to record low food wastage per capita owing to good wastage management policies and consumer practices. Regression analysis identifies domestic food wastage, manufacturing waste, and retail wastage as the main drivers of total per capita food wastage, with per capita GDP (Gross Domestic Product) and carbon footprint playing weak roles. Cluster analysis places EU countries into three groups: low-waste countries with highly structured food systems, moderately-waste countries where food wastage at domestic levels prevails, and high-waste countries where there is inefficiency at food production, processing, and consumption levels. These findings necessitate specific interventions. Policy needs to address food waste minimization at the household level via consumer awareness and behavior change initiatives and remove inefficiencies in the manufacturing and retail value chains through the simplification of inventory management, redistribution chains, and incentive regulation. Regional, rather than one-size-fits-all, EU-wide policy is required in order to achieve significant progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.