Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238329›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Contribution of Structure Learning Algorithms in Social Epidemiology: Application to Real-World Data.

Helene Colineaux, Benoit Lepage, Pierre Chauvin, Chloe Dimeglio, Cyrille Delpierre, Thomas Lefèvre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helene ColineauxEQUITY Team, Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche en Santé des POPulations (CERPOP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Toulouse III University, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8164-0293
Benoit LepageEQUITY Team, Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche en Santé des POPulations (CERPOP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Toulouse III University, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Pierre ChauvinUMRS 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Social Epidemiology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Sorbonne University, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-6406
Chloe DimeglioToulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (INFINITY), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR 1291, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 5051, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Cyrille DelpierreEQUITY Team, Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche en Santé des POPulations (CERPOP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Toulouse III University, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Thomas LefèvreUMRS 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Social Epidemiology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Sorbonne University, 75005 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiologists often handle large datasets with numerous variables and are currently seeing a growing wealth of techniques for data analysis, such as machine learning. Critical aspects involve addressing causality, often based on observational data, and dealing with the complex relationships between variables to uncover the overall structure of variable interactions, causal or not. Structure learning (SL) methods aim to automatically or semi-automatically reveal the structure of variables' relationships. The objective of this study is to delineate some of the potential contributions and limitations of structure learning methods when applied to social epidemiology topics and the search for determinants of healthcare system access. We applied SL techniques to a real-world dataset, namely the 2010 wave of the SIRS cohort, which included a sample of 3006 adults from the Paris region, France. Healthcare utilization, encompassing both direct and indirect access to care, was the primary outcome. Candidate determinants included health status, demographic characteristics, and socio-cultural and economic positions. We present two approaches: a non-automated epidemiological method (an initial expert knowledge network and stepwise logistic regression models) and three SL techniques using various algorithms, with and without knowledge constraints. We compared the results based on the presence, direction, and strength of specific links within the produced network. Although the interdependencies and relative strengths identified by both approaches were similar, the SL algorithms detect fewer associations with the outcome than the non-automated method. Relationships between variables were sometimes incorrectly oriented when using a purely data-driven approach. SL algorithms can be valuable in exploratory stages, helping to generate new hypotheses or mining novel databases. However, results should be validated against prior knowledge and supplemented with additional confirmatory analyses.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedParisBayesian networkcausal discoverydirected acyclic graphgraphical modelshealthcare system utilizationsocial epidemiologystructure learning

Identifiers

PMID40238329
PMCPMC11941975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.