Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238312›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Cheesecake Customized Using Juice and By-Products from Prickly Pears: A Case Study of Recycling and Environmental Impact Evaluation.

Alessia Le Rose, Olimpia Panza, Dario Caro, Amalia Conte, Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessia Le RoseEcodynamics Group, Department of Physical Sciences, Earth, Environment, University of Siena, Piazzetta Enzo Tiezzi, 1, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Olimpia PanzaDepartment of Humanistic Studies, Letters, Cultural Heritage, Educational Sciences, University of Foggia, Via Arpi, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1198-0361
Dario CaroEcodynamics Group, Department of Physical Sciences, Earth, Environment, University of Siena, Piazzetta Enzo Tiezzi, 1, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Amalia ConteDepartment of Humanistic Studies, Letters, Cultural Heritage, Educational Sciences, University of Foggia, Via Arpi, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-9816
Matteo Alessandro Del NobileDepartment of Economics, Management and Territory, University of Foggia, Via A. da Zara, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8978-6449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increasing concern about the negative impact of the modern food system and the need to design foods to improve their healthiness and sustainability, in the current study, a fortified cheesecake was developed by using juice, peels, and pomace from prickly pears, which are fruit by-products rich in active compounds. After proper dehydration and being ground to produce a fine powder, some traditional ingredients were substituted with fruit juice and by-products. The water content loss during dehydration and the energy consumed per g of dehydrated by-product were assessed using a proper mathematical approach. A sensory evaluation was carried out using a panel test, thus verifying that the new dessert made with prickly pears was comparable to the traditional one; both recorded high scores of acceptability (sensory score ranged between 8 and 9). The centesimal composition of the two cheesecakes also demonstrated that the ingredient substitution did not affect the energetic value of the final product (290 vs. 248 kcal/100 g); on the contrary, it promoted an increase in carbohydrates (27.38 vs. 26.26 g/100 g), lipids (16.98 vs. 12.94 g/100 g), and total fibers (5.7 vs. 4.2 g/100 g). To demonstrate that the recycling of by-products from prickly pears could represent an advantage from an environmental point of view, a full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was carried out. In relation to this, three environmental impact categories, such as Global Warming Potential, Acidification and Eutrophication, which are associated with three different biowaste treatment options-such as composting, landfilling, and recycling-were assessed. The results from the LCA highlighted that recycling always emerged as the most sustainable biowaste management option. For all environmental impact categories analyzed, recycling resulted in an overall environmental saving (-7.63 kgCO

Indexed as

by-product valorizationcheesecakeenvironmental impactprickly pearsrecyclingsustainable food

Identifiers

PMID40238312
PMCPMC11988937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.