Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238273›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Health Risk Assessment of Nail Technicians in the Formal and Informal Sectors of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Goitsemang Keretetse, Gill Nelson, Derk Brouwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Goitsemang KeretetseSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9586-9320
Gill NelsonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7815-3718
Derk BrouwerSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1750-3715

Funding

National Research Foundation TTK170511230614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in nail salons poses risks of acute and chronic health effects for nail technicians. The objectives of this study were to investigate differences in VOC exposure and self-reported symptoms among formal and informal nail technicians and assess the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks using a probabilistic approach. A questionnaire was administered to 54 formal and 60 informal nail technicians to elicit information on sociodemographic characteristics, work conditions, and self-reported symptoms. Passive sampling was employed to measure 60 personal breathing zone concentrations of VOCs among 20 nail technicians (both formal and informal) over three consecutive days, along with 29 passive samples for formaldehyde in the informal sector. All VOC concentrations, except formaldehyde, were below occupational exposure limits. Sixty percent of the informal nail technicians and fifty-two percent of the formal nail technicians reported health-related symptoms; however, the difference was not statistically significant (

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalBeauty CultureOccupational ExposureVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultFemaleFormaldehydeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNailsRisk AssessmentSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAir Pollutants, OccupationalFormaldehydeVolatile Organic CompoundsformaldehydeMonte Carlo simulationprobabilistic risk assessmentself-reported symptomsvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID40238273
PMCPMC11942596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.