ReviewJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2025
Xenotransplantation: Current Understanding of the Mechanism of Immune-Mediated Injury.
Review in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary UDP-sugars provide actionable prediction of acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery patients.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- Commemorating the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases' Advances in Kidney Health: 75 Years of Discovery and Impact.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- A pharmacovigilance study of sirolimus-associated adverse events in organ transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Commemorating the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases' Advances in Kidney Health: 75 Years of Discovery and Impact.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scarcity of transplantable organs represents a worldwide public health crisis, and as a result, thousands of people with kidney failure die waiting for a transplant each year. Xenotransplantation involves transplanting organs from an animal source into humans, offering a potential solution to this significant unmet need. Indeed, if there is a limitless supply of organs, many more patients who do not meet the current criteria for transplant eligibility could also be considered as candidates. Although there are examples of attempts to transplant animal tissues or organs into humans dating back over 300 years, none were successful due to cross-species immunologic incompatibility. Even so, significant advances in genetic engineering and the emergence of novel immunosuppressive agents have spurred impressive improvements in xenograft survival in preclinical studies involving nonhuman primates. Furthermore, recent reports of genetically modified pig kidney and heart xenotransplants in human decedents and living recipients on a compassionate use basis have provided impetus to advancing the field toward first-in-human trials. However, studies in nonhuman primates and humans thus far have described adaptive as well as innate immune-mediated xenograft injury. Understanding the mechanistic aspects of these responses at the cellular and molecular levels is critical to the development of targeted genetic modifications and innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing rejection and inducing tolerance. Moreover, the physiologic components of the bidirectional communication between the human host and pig xenograft must also be understood and manipulated. Here, we review the breakthroughs in kidney xenotransplantation in the past few decades and highlight the immunologic hurdles that have yet to be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.