ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Current Progress and Future Trends of Genomics-Based Techniques for Food Adulteration Identification.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Barcoding and Comparative Nutritional Profiling of "Cod" () Products from Chinese E-Commerce Platforms.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CRISPR-based tools in food safety and microbiology: applications for pathogen detection and control.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Species Identification of Sea Turtles in Thailand Using DNA Barcoding Coupled With High-Resolution Melting (Bar-HRM) Analysis.Scientifica · 2026Article
- Development of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Six Commercially Important Bivalves.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can Metagenomic Analyses Be Used Effectively in Safe Food Production?Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Detection and Quantification of House Crickets (Insects · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing the pervasive issue of food adulteration and fraud driven by economic interests has long presented a complex challenge. Such adulteration not only compromises the safety of the food supply chain and destabilizes the market economy but also poses significant risks to public health. Food adulteration encompasses practices such as substitution, process manipulation, mislabeling, the introduction of undeclared ingredients, and the adulteration of genetically modified foods. Given the diverse range of deceptive methods employed, genomics-based identification techniques have increasingly been utilized for detecting food adulteration. Compared to traditional detection methods, technologies such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), high-resolution melt (HRM) analysis, DNA barcoding, and the CRISPR-Cas system have demonstrated efficacy in accurately and sensitively detecting even trace amounts of adulterants. This paper provides an overview of genomics-based approaches for identifying food adulteration, summarizes the latest applications in certification procedures, discusses current limitations, and explores potential future trends, thereby offering new insights to enhance the control of food quality and contributing to the development of more robust regulatory frameworks and food safety policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.