Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238250›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Progress and Future Trends of Genomics-Based Techniques for Food Adulteration Identification.

Jing Zhao, Wei Yang, Hongli Cai, Guangtian Cao, Zhanming Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing ZhaoSchool of Grain Science and Technology, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.
Wei YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Products Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.
Hongli CaiCollege of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Guangtian CaoCollege of Standardisation, China Jiliang Universtiy, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhanming LiSchool of Grain Science and Technology, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-3310

Funding

Key Research and Development Projects in Hainan Province Grant No. ZDYF2024GXJS316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing the pervasive issue of food adulteration and fraud driven by economic interests has long presented a complex challenge. Such adulteration not only compromises the safety of the food supply chain and destabilizes the market economy but also poses significant risks to public health. Food adulteration encompasses practices such as substitution, process manipulation, mislabeling, the introduction of undeclared ingredients, and the adulteration of genetically modified foods. Given the diverse range of deceptive methods employed, genomics-based identification techniques have increasingly been utilized for detecting food adulteration. Compared to traditional detection methods, technologies such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), high-resolution melt (HRM) analysis, DNA barcoding, and the CRISPR-Cas system have demonstrated efficacy in accurately and sensitively detecting even trace amounts of adulterants. This paper provides an overview of genomics-based approaches for identifying food adulteration, summarizes the latest applications in certification procedures, discusses current limitations, and explores potential future trends, thereby offering new insights to enhance the control of food quality and contributing to the development of more robust regulatory frameworks and food safety policies.

Indexed as

CRISPR–Cas systemDNA barcodingfood adulterationfood authenticationhigh-resolution melt analysis

Identifiers

PMID40238250
PMCPMC11989147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.