Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238239›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2025

Acceptability, Usability, and Insights Into Cybersickness Levels of a Novel Virtual Reality Environment for the Evaluation of Depressive Symptoms: Exploratory Observational Study.

Sara Sutori, Emma Therése Eliasson, Francesca Mura, Victor Ortiz, Vincenzo Catrambonephd, Gergö Hadlaczky, Ivo Todorov, Antonio Luca Alfeo, Valentina Cardi, Mario G C A Cimino and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sara Sutori *National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-0780
Emma Therése Eliasson *National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-8567
Francesca MuraPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-6127
Victor OrtizInstituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, Universitat Politècnica de València, Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación, València, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-6288-2369
Vincenzo CatrambonephdResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9030-7601
Gergö HadlaczkyNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-6244
Ivo TodorovNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2100-1443
Antonio Luca AlfeoResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0928-3188
Valentina CardiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7763-7099
Mario G C A CiminoResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1031-1959
Giovanna MioniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-4591
Mariano Alcañiz RayaInstituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, Universitat Politècnica de València, Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación, València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-0636
Gaetano ValenzaResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6574-1879
Vladimir Carli *National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-0675
Claudio Gentili *Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2579-8755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a clear need for enhanced mental health assessment, depressive symptom (DS) evaluation being no exception. A promising approach to this aim is using virtual reality (VR), which entails the potential of adding a wider set of assessment domains with enhanced ecological validity. However, whilst several studies have used VR for both diagnostic and treatment purposes, its acceptance, in particular how exposure to virtual environments affects populations with psychiatric conditions remains unknown.

objectiveThis study aims to report on the acceptability, usability, and cybersickness levels of a pilot VR environment designed for the purpose of differentiating between individuals with DSs.

methodsThe exploratory study, conducted in Italy, included 50 healthy controls and 50 young adults with mild-to-moderate DSs (without the need for a formal diagnosis). The study used an observational design with approximately 30 minutes of VR exposure followed by a self-report questionnaire battery. The battery included a questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, the System Usability Scale as well as the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire.

resultsResults indicate that the majority found VR acceptable for the purposes of mental health screening and treatment. However, for diagnostics, there was a clear preference for VR to be used by mental health professionals as a supplementary tool, as opposed to a stand-alone solution. In practice, following exposure to the pilot VR environment, generally, good levels of acceptability and usability were reported, but areas in need of improvement were identified (such as self-efficacy). Self-reported cybersickness levels were comparable to literature averages but were considerably higher among those with DSs.

conclusionsThese findings raise questions about the potential interplay between underlying somatic symptoms of depression and VR-induced cybersickness and call for more attention from the scientific community both in terms of methodology as well as potential clinical and theoretical implications. Conclusively, user support indicates a potential for VR to aid mental health assessment, but further research is needed to understand how exposure to virtual environments might affect populations with varying severity and other forms of psychiatric symptoms. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/ISRCTN16396369.

Indexed as

DepressionVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansItalyMalePilot ProjectsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer InterfaceYoung Adultacceptabilityassessmentcybersicknessdepressionusabilityvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40238239
PMCPMC12044318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.