Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238235›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Physiotherapists' User Acceptance of a Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeleton in Specialized Rehabilitation: Qualitative Exploratory Study.

Anstein Olimb Hillkirk, Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen, Hege Mari Johnsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anstein Olimb Hillkirk *Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0411-0100
Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen *Center for Research and Innovation, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-3875
Hege Mari Johnsen *Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-9822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic lower limb exoskeletons have emerged as promising tools in the clinical rehabilitation of patients with lower limb paralysis due to neurological disease, stroke, or spinal cord injury. Identified benefits in gait function rehabilitation include improved gait function, cardiovascular effects, enhanced training quality, patient motivation, and reduced physical and psychological workload for therapists. Despite the identified benefits, the successful adoption of this technology largely depends on therapists' user acceptance.

objectiveThis study aims to explore physiotherapists' perceptions of using robot-assisted lower-limb gait training in specialized neurological rehabilitation using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology framework.

methodsA qualitative, exploratory research design with a deductive approach was used. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 7 expert physiotherapists in a Norwegian specialized rehabilitation hospital. Data collection and analysis were guided by the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology framework.

resultsThe physiotherapists' use of lower limb exoskeletons was greatly influenced by perceived benefits for patients or challenges, such as usability issues, the time required for adjustment to each patient, and the lack of personnel resources to facilitate their use. Thus, perceived usefulness and facilitating conditions (or lack thereof) had a great influence on the physiotherapists' intentions to use and the actual use of the exoskeleton.

conclusionsThis study identified several factors influencing the physiotherapists' acceptance and integration of the lower limb exoskeleton. Available resources, such as time and personnel, were emphasized as important factors to increase the use of the exoskeleton in specialized rehabilitation. Our findings may inform service providers and engineers in specialized neurological rehabilitation settings.

Indexed as

assistive technologyclinical implementationdeductive analysisRAGTrehabilitationrobot-assisted gait training therapyunified theory of acceptance and use of technologyuser experiencesUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID40238235
PMCPMC12044315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.