Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238176›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025

Disparities in heart transplant survival and graft rejection outcomes persist in the modern era: a call to race towards a more equitable future.

Ahad Firoz, Daniel Remer, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Eman Hamad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahad FirozDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6223-0731
Daniel RemerCenter for Urban Bioethics, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Huaqing ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Education and Data Science, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Xiaoning LuDepartment of Biomedical Education and Data Science, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eman HamadDepartment of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRacial and ethnic disparities remain an ongoing challenge in healthcare. Such inequities have been reported in heart transplantation (HTx); however, there is limited data within the modern era. Additionally, there is scarce information on outcomes besides death, such as graft rejection. Therefore, our investigation aims to add further data on contemporary racial and ethnic disparities on post-transplant outcomes.

methodsAdult isolated HTx recipients who were transplanted between 1/2000 and 9/2023 were analysed using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Inclusion criteria included 'White', 'Black', 'Hispanic' and 'Asian' recipients. Two primary outcomes of interest were analysed: mortality and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Survival was assessed using a cause-specific model, whereas CAV analysis utilized a competing-risk approach. Subgroup survival analysis was conducted for patients listed in the years prior to (11/2013-10/2018) and after (10/2018-9/2023) the 2018 heart allocation policy (HAP) changes.

resultsA total of 50 243 patients were included in our analysis. Black recipients were the only group found to have an increased overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, P < 0.001) and post-HAP (HR = 1.36, P < 0.001) mortality risk. Asian (HR = 1.19, P= 0.001) and Hispanic (HR = 1.15, P < 0.001) recipients had elevated risks of CAV, whereas Black patients had similar risk (HR = 1.00, P = 0.864) as White recipients.

conclusionsOur investigation suggests that disparities continue to exist for minority groups after HTx. Notably, the 2018 allocation changes may have introduced or exacerbated such inequities for Black recipients.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionGraft SurvivalHealthcare DisparitiesHeart TransplantationAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesdisparitiesgraft rejectionheart transplantationracesurvivalUNOS

Identifiers

PMID40238176
PMCPMC12036964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.