No robust evidence for an effect of head-movement propensity on central bias in head-constrained scene viewing, despite an effect on fixation duration.

When viewing natural scenes, participants tend to direct their gaze towards the image center, the so-called "central bias." Unless the head is fixed, gaze shifts to peripheral targets are accomplished by a combination of eye and head movements, with substantial individual differences in the propensity to use the head. We address the relation of central bias and head-movement propensity. In one part of the experiment, participants viewed natural scenes of two different sizes without moving their head. We found that the central bias of each individual scaled with image size. In another experimental part, the same participants stood in the center of a panoramic screen and shifted their gaze to peripheral targets. Target eccentricities were either instructed by text (endogenous mode) or by a bar appearing at the target location (exogenous mode). In this "peripheral-target" task, we found a strong correlation between the exogenous and the endogenous mode, indicating that they provide a robust measure of an individual's head-movement propensity. Despite substantial inter-individual variability in both tasks, no significant correlation was found between head-movement propensity and central bias, and a trend toward significance for a specific measure was brittle. However, individuals with a higher head-movement propensity tended to have shorter fixation durations in scene viewing. Our results suggest that central bias in free scene viewing on typical screen sizes is predominately determined by visual properties. Although head-movement propensity seems to affect some aspects of scene-viewing behavior (fixation durations), individual differences in central bias are not explained by head-movement propensity.