ArticleJournal of vision2025
Visual factors that determine sensory uncertainty in rapid interceptive hand movements.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracking and intercepting a moving object requires predicting its trajectory, an ability that depends on the reliability of the available motion information. We investigated two common sources that limit the reliability (certainty) of visual motion information during laboratory object interception: how long an object is shown and how long it is occluded. A simulated flyball was shown briefly on a screen and then occluded before it entered a hit zone. Observers tracked the trajectory of the ball with their eyes and intercepted it in the hit zone with a rapid pointing movement. In a two-part experiment, we either varied the presentation of the ball or occlusion duration. Short presentation duration produced a strong center bias in hand movements, but long occlusion duration yielded only a weak center bias. Whereas the center bias merely improved with long presentation durations, it was fully resolved when occlusion duration was short. These findings indicate that sensorimotor decisions under uncertainty might have to rely more on priors when an object is presented briefly versus when it is occluded for longer periods. Eye and hand movement accuracy were correlated across levels of uncertainty, confirming that predictive processes guiding these effectors share a common readout of motion information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.