Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238123›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Cytologic DNA methylation for managing minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening results.

Xiao Shang, Linghua Kong, Yan You, Huanwen Wu, Yuligh Liou, Xitong Jin, Pei Liu, Jinghe Lang, Lei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. DNMT Enzymes and Their Impact on Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Cytologic DNA methylation for managing minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening results.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiao ShangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Linghua KongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan YouDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huanwen WuDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuligh LiouDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Beijing Origin-Poly Bio-Tec Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xitong JinDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Beijing Origin-Poly Bio-Tec Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Pei LiuDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Beijing Origin-Poly Bio-Tec Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Jinghe LangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8723-3461

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2024-I2M-C&T-B-029National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-083, 2022-PUMCH-C-010, 2022-PUMCH-C-022 and 2022-PUMCH-D-003Peking Union Medical College Hospital Young Reserve Talent Development Program UHB12577State Key Laboratory for Complex, Severe and Rare Diseases in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, by the Key Research Project of Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z220013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the role of a DNA methylation assay for managing minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening results in a prospective cohort undergoing opportunistic cervical cancer screening.

methodsIn the cohort of the METHY2 and METHY3 screening studies of women undergoing opportunistic cervical cancer screening, cervical cytology samples were sent for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA assays, cytologic pathology and methylation assays of PAX1/JAM3 (CISCER). This study evaluated the discriminative power of CISCER in managing women with minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening results for CIN3+. Absolute CIN3+ risks and colposcopy referrals within one screening round were calculated.

resultsA total of 1857 women with minimally abnormal cervical cancer findings had cervical histologic outcomes and were included in the analysis. In women with a minimally abnormal cervical cancer result, the sensitivity and specificity of CISCER was 74.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%-81.4%) and 89.1% (95% CI 87.6%-90.6%) for detecting CIN3+. CISCER analysis discriminated well for minimally abnormal cervical cancer results, yielding a CIN3+ risk of 40.5% (95% CI 34.9%-46.2%) after a positive result and a CIN3+ risk of 2.7% (95% CI 2.0%-3.6%) after a negative result.

conclusionsIn women with a minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening result, the CISCER provides excellent detection of CIN3+. The use of CISCER in women with a minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening result can lead to a substantial reduction in the number of direct colposcopy referrals.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEarly Detection of CancerUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultColposcopyDNA, ViralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPaired Box Transcription FactorsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, ViralPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX1 transcription factorDNA methylationhigh‐risk human papillomavirusimmediate riskminimally abnormal cervical cancer test result

Identifiers

PMID40238123
PMCPMC12447664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.