ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2025
Feasibility of Telephone-Based Cognitive Assessments and Healthcare Utilization in US Medicare-Enrolled Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge.
Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWider screening and assessment for Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias (ADRD) may increase access to supportive care, improve allocation of medical care, and foster the use of interventions that prevent or delay disease progression. Yet, the effect of diagnostic timing on clinical and utilization outcomes is poorly understood. Community-based settings such as a hospital emergency department (ED) may be an underrecognized opportunity to assess cognition and impacts on individuals and health systems. This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting older adults for telephone-based trials following presentation to the ED and administering telephone based cognitive assessments over the phone in this population.
methodsMedicare-enrolled individuals 65+ years of age (n = 160) presenting to the Oregon Health & Science University Emergency Department (Portland, Oregon) between May 2022 and February 2023 were recruited by telephone. Participants were administered the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) Assessment and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Measure Questions on Mental Clarity via telephone 1-12 weeks post-discharge to evaluate cognition. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for medical care utilization including primary care provider (PCP) visits, hospital admissions, and ED visits for the 3 years prior to ED presentation.
resultsTwenty-six percent of eligible ED users contacted elected for study enrollment. The TICS Assessment score had a significant relationship with the three evaluated health care utilization measures (ED, PCP visits, or hospitalizations); the PROMIS Assessment had significant but weak correlations to ED and PCP visits.
conclusionsOlder adults 65+ years presenting to the ED are amenable to enroll in telephone-based cognition-focused trials and cognitive assessments can be carried out over the telephone in this population. The PROMIS Assessment may be a better cognition assessment tool when evaluating for cognition and care utilization in this population. In addition to the limits of the screening tools used in this study, a lack of a representative sample is a limitation of the study design. Future studies could use other validated cognitive assessment tools and utilize a study design with a recruitment strategy focused on obtaining a representative sample of older ED patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.