Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238056›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2025

Predictive Factors for Super Responder Status and Long-Term Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Psoriasis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Edoardo Mortato, Marina Talamonti, Lorenzo Marcelli, Matteo Megna, Annunziata Raimondo, Giacomo Caldarola, Nicoletta Bernardini, Anna Balato, Anna Campanati, Maria Esposito and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Predictors of clinical response to biologics in psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis: What Have We Learnt so Far?Journal of inflammation research · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Edoardo MortatoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Marina TalamontiDermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo MarcelliDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Matteo MegnaSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Annunziata RaimondoDepartment of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Giacomo CaldarolaInstitute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nicoletta BernardiniDermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Anna BalatoDermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Anna CampanatiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences-Dermatological Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. anna.campanati@gmail.com.
Maria EspositoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Claudio BonifatiDepartment of Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Viviana LoraDepartment of Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luca PotestioSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Serena LemboDepartment of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Francesco LoconsoleDepartment of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Eleonora De LucaInstitute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nevena SkrozaDermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Dario BuononatoDermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Tommaso BianchelliDermatology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Maria Concetta FargnoliSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Nello TommasinoSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Felice PrimaveraDepartment of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Clara De SimoneInstitute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Luca BianchiDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Marco GalluzzoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-5175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder, affecting around 2-3% of the global population. The IL-23/Th17 signaling pathway plays a critical role in disease progression. Guselkumab, an IL-23p19 monoclonal antibody, has shown substantial efficacy in clinical trials for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, preliminary identification of super responders (SRe: patients achieving PASI 100 at week 20) can help optimize treatment strategies. This study aims to identify predictive factors for SRe status in patients receiving guselkumab therapy for psoriasis and to evaluate long-term effectiveness in the entire cohort and both SRe and non-super-responder (nSRe) groups to understand whether SRe status is also a predictor of long-term response to guselkumab in a real-world setting.

methodsA retrospective longitudinal study was conducted at ten Italian centers between January and October 2024. Data from 1008 patients treated with guselkumab for at least 20 weeks were analyzed. Patients were classified as SRe (PASI 100 at week 20) and nSRe. Baseline clinical and anthropometric profiles, comorbidities, and treatment history were collected. Efficacy was evaluated using PASI scores. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for achieving SRe status.

resultsOf 1008 patients, 581 (57.6%) were classified as SRe, while 427 (42.4%) were nSRe. SRe patients were more likely to be bio-naïve and had lower baseline PASI scores and comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Multivariate logistic regression identified obesity, prior biologic therapy, and a higher baseline PASI as negative predictors for SRe status. Guselkumab demonstrated significant long-term efficacy, with SRe patients achieving sustained PASI 100 in 85% at year 4 and 83.4% at year 5 compared to 54% and 59.2% in nSRe patients, respectively.

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of identifying patients most likely to achieve PASI 100 early in treatment. Factors such as obesity, prior biologic experience, and baseline PASI contribute to predicting complete skin clearance, which can guide clinical decision-making and enable personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

GuselkumabLong-term efficacyPredictive factorsPsoriasisSuper responders

Identifiers

PMID40238056
PMCPMC12033149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.