ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
James-Stein Estimator Improves Accuracy and Sample Efficiency in Human Kinematic and Metabolic Data.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural variability can increase human walking metabolic costs and its implications to simulation-based metabolic estimation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human biomechanical data are often accompanied with measurement noise and behavioral variability. Errors due to such noise and variability are usually exaggerated by fewer trials or shorter trial durations and could be reduced using more trials or longer trial durations. Speeding up such data collection by lowering number of trials or trial duration, while improving the accuracy of statistical estimates, would be of particular interest in wearable robotics applications and when the human population studied is vulnerable (e.g., the elderly). Here, we propose the use of the James-Stein estimator (JSE) to improve statistical estimates with a given amount of data or reduce the amount of data needed for a given accuracy. The JSE is a shrinkage estimator that produces a uniform reduction in the summed squared errors when compared with the more familiar maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), simple averages, or other least squares regressions. When data from multiple human participants are available, an individual participant's JSE can improve upon MLE by incorporating information from all participants, improving overall estimation accuracy on average. Here, we apply the JSE to multiple time series of kinematic and metabolic data from the following parameter estimation problems: foot placement control during level walking, energy expenditure during circle walking, and energy expenditure during resting. We show that the resulting estimates improve accuracy-that is, the James-Stein estimates have lower summed squared error from the 'true' value compared with more conventional estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.