Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy and safety of non-ablative ErYAG laser for mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Energy-Based Devices for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Randomised Sham-Controlled Trials.International urogynecology journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a non-ablative vaginal Er: YAG laser device in treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial in which women with SUI received either active treatment with Er: YAG laser therapy or sham control with a non-therapeutic handpiece. Patients underwent three treatments spaced one month apart. The primary endpoint measure was the treatment success rate at three months post-treatment. A total of 126 participants with SUI were recruited, with 84 in the active arm and 42 in the sham arm. One participant in the sham arm was excluded due to not using research instruments. The treatment success rate at three months post-treatment was 36.59% in the sham arm and 71.43% in the active arm, with an absolute difference of 34.84% (95% CI: 17.2-52.5%). Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) score and incontinence questionnaire short form (ICIQ-SF) score demonstrated significant improvement in the both arms with no substantial difference between the groups. Non-ablative vaginal ErYAG laser therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in objectively measured SUI symptoms compared to sham treatment. The non-ablative Er: YAG laser therapy seems to be a promising non-surgical treatment option for SUI patients. The limitations of this study are the short follow-up and limited sample size, so additional studies with longer follow-up and larger number of patients are needed to further elucidate the role of this therapy for SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40238038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.