ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025
Evaluation of the Association Between Postpartum Hemorrhage and Antidepressant Use: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between antidepressants, depression, and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) has been reported in observational studies, but the causal link between these factors remains unknown. Clarifying this relationship is important for treating depression during pregnancy and managing PPH.
objectiveWe aimed to assess the causal relationship between antidepressants, depression, and PPH using a two-sample Mendelian randomization method.
methodsSingle nucleotide polymorphisms were identified from publicly available genetics summary databases (FinnGen database, access date: 28 December, 2023, version R9, phenocode: ANTIDEPRESSANTS, 195,321 participants; the genome-wide association studies [GWAS] catalog, access date: 3 April, 2024, GWAS ID: ebi-a-GCST90016607; Integrative Epidemiological Unit database, access date: 3 April, 2024, GWAS ID: ieu-a-1187) as alternative exposure factors for antidepressants and depression. Subsequently, inverse variance weighting, Mendelian randomization-Egger regression, weighted median, simple method, and weighted method were employed for Mendelian randomization analyses, and the results were validated for pleiotropy, heterogeneity, and sensitivity.
resultsThe analyses employed three sets of genetic tools, comprising two sets of 9 and 32 single nucleotide polymorphisms that are strongly associated with depression and another set of 26 single nucleotide polymorphisms that are associated with antidepressants. The inverse variance weighting indicated that antidepressants are associated with PPH (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.69, p = 0.005). Conversely, none of the five methods of Mendelian randomization analysis identified an effect of depression on PPH.
conclusionsThis Mendelian randomization analysis indicated that antidepressant use is associated with PPH. However, the evidence does not support a causal relationship between depression and PPH.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.