ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
A Delphi study of current practices and establishing consensus regarding assessment of fitness to drive among patients with brain tumours.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvaluating fitness to drive among patients with brain tumours remains a challenge for clinicians. Due to difficulties in conducting prospective driving studies in this patient cohort, a Delphi study was performed to formulate new driving guidelines for patients with brain tumours.
methodsThe survey questions, which were designed by utilising Australian driving guidelines and previous Delphi studies, established panelists' expertise, and then used a 9-point Likert scale to formulate new driving guidelines. An expert group of panelists comprising medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists were chosen based on membership to professional societies with validation in part one of the survey. Two rounds of anonymised surveys were performed using REDCap for data entry, and a novel automated methodology on R for data analysis.
results46 statements regarding fitness to drive were developed. Among the 37 surveys distributed, there were 26 responses (70.3% response rate) from round one, and 17 responses (65.4% response rate) for round two. Among the 46 statements, 19 (41.3%) achieved consensus. In addition to establishing a framework for assessing patients, there was notable consensus agreement for stable imaging required as part of evaluation and the need for continual reassessment.
conclusionDespite clinicians being aware of driving guidelines, determining fitness to drive among patients with brain tumours remains a challenge. This Delphi study identified consensus agreement for the need for stable imaging, and continually reassessing fitness to drive. These novel findings could be translated into future driving guidelines and consensus statements can be integrated into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.