Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238021›Full record

ArticleCJEM2025

Process mapping as a framework to define critical care delivery steps in massive transfusion in trauma.

Matthew A Bergens, Jessica D Guo, Bruce W Rogers, Ursula A Rogers, Jessica L Poisson, Emily C Sterrett, Zachary Ginsberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew A Bergens *Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5395-2123
Jessica D Guo *Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7066-2996
Bruce W RogersDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-7645
Ursula A RogersDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-3918
Jessica L PoissonTransfusion Services, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-6436
Emily C SterrettDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5461-4487
Zachary GinsbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Zachary.Ginsberg@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8157-2486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to use process mapping to identify the critical process steps for executing massive transfusion in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock in an academic emergency department. Understanding the relationships and complexity of care delivery steps in massive transfusion is needed to inform the development of performance metrics and improve care delivery.

methodsThis process mapping exercise was conducted in the academic emergency department of a verified trauma center using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework. Interviews were conducted with emergency department staff members, including nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and blood bank staff. Data collection included structured stakeholder interviews and real-time observation of massive transfusion protocol deployment.

resultsSeventeen interviews and real-time observations yielded 87 pages of interview text and 533 objects mapped. Two key clinical decision points were identified: the decision to transfuse and the decision to image. The process was segmented into initial protocol-based care and subsequent physician-driven care. High-level and mid-level process maps, incorporating swim lanes, were created to highlight the process steps to deliver of massive transfusion to trauma patient in our academic emergency department.

conclusionProcess mapping resulted in the creation of an agreed upon standard process that outlines critical steps and distinct phases of care in delivery of the massive transfusion protocol. These findings provide benchmarks for future improvement work and performance measurement efforts.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionCritical CareEmergency Service, HospitalQuality ImprovementShock, HemorrhagicWounds and InjuriesHumansTrauma CentersImprovementLearning health systemMass transfusionProcess mappingTrauma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.