ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in adult cancer patients presenting to emergency department with non-neutropenic fever and/or suspected infection.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Mortality Risk of Colistin vs. Non-Colistin Use in Cancer Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: Stratified by Resistance Profile and Concomitant Medications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is currently a lack of evidence regarding antibiotic use for adult cancer patients presenting with non-neutropenic fever. This study evaluated broad-spectrum antibiotics use among adult cancer patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with non-neutropenic fever or/and suspected infection.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was completed that included adult patients with solid malignancies who presented to Juravinski Hospital ED with non-neutropenic fever or suspected infection from July 1 to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received one or more dose(s) of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Additionally, a multivariate logistic regression was completed to assess factors associated with an increased likelihood of clinicians prescribing broad-spectrum antibiotics.
resultsOf 275 patients analyzed, broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were used in 47% (109/230) of the cohort, and most of the time (78%) was the first antibiotic type given after arrival in ED. Age, gender, comorbidities, and receiving systemic treatment were not significantly associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use. There were higher rates of broad-spectrum antibiotics prescribed to patients with stage IV cancer (OR 2.8, p = 0.002) and genitourinary cancer (OR 6.7, p < 0.001).
conclusionIn our single-center study, nearly half of adult cancer patients received broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. With a few exceptions, there was generally no consistent criteria on which clinician prescribes broad-spectrum antibiotics. These data suggest a need for quality improvement strategies to improve antibiotic stewardship for cancer patients presenting with non-neutropenic fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40237926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.