ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Ultrasound Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in Belgium, France and The Netherlands.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Resistant Blood Pressure: New Frontiers in Interventional Hypertension Therapy.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Review
- Guidelines and procedures for renal denervation in Western European hospitals: how does renal denervation fit the Polish context?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) with the Paradise System has emerged as an adjunctive treatment option for the management of uncontrolled resistant hypertension (rHTN). This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of uRDN for rHTN across three European countries-Belgium, France and the Netherlands.
methodsOn the basis of a previously developed state-transition Markov model, we projected costs, life years (LYs) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) with the addition of uRDN to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone over patient lifetime. Analyses were based on the RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial, which demonstrated a mean reduction in office systolic blood pressure from a baseline of 8.5 mmHg at 2 months post-uRDN among patients with rHTN. Mortality and costs data were separately sourced and applied for each country independently. Country-specific discount rates were applied to both cost and outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
resultsThe base-case analyses of the models for all three countries show uRDN plus SoC results in improvement in both LYs and QALYs per patient and higher costs compared with SoC alone. The mean ICERs for each country model fall well below the respective country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTPs)-Belgium: WTP €40,000 and ICER €4426/QALY gained; France: WTP €50,000 and ICER €6261/QALY gained; and the Netherlands: WTP €20,000 and ICER €1654/QALY gained. Results were robust across scenarios and sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsThe addition of endovascular uRDN offers clinicians and payers a cost-effective adjunctive treatment approach alongside hypertensive medication for the management of rHTN in the healthcare systems of Belgium, France and the Netherlands.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.