ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted multimodal imaging for the clinical applications of breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Convolutional-transformer fusion of ultrasound and diffuse optical tomography for breast lesion classification.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and breast cancer screening in Serbia: a dual-perspective qualitative study among radiologists and screening-aged women.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Mapping the future of early breast cancer diagnosis: a bibliometric analysis of AI innovations.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally, with increasing incidence rates posing significant public health challenges. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized medical imaging, particularly in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and prognostic capabilities for BC. While multimodal imaging combined with AI has shown remarkable potential, a comprehensive analysis is needed to synthesize current research and identify emerging trends and hotspots in AI-assisted multimodal imaging for BC.
methodsThis study analyzed literature on AI-assisted multimodal imaging in BC from January 2010 to November 2024 in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometric and visualization tools, including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the Bibliometrix R package, were employed to assess countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords.
resultsA total of 80 publications were included, revealing a steady increase in annual publications and citations, with a notable surge post-2021. China led in productivity and citations, while Germany exhibited the highest citation average. The United States demonstrated the strongest international collaboration. The most productive institution and author are Radboud University Nijmegen and Xi, Xiaoming. Publications were predominantly published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, with Qian, XJ's 2021 study on BC risk prediction under deep learning frameworks being the most influential. Keyword analysis highlighted themes such as "breast cancer", "classification", and "deep learning".
conclusionsAI-assisted multimodal imaging has significantly advanced BC diagnosis and management, with promising future developments. This study offers researchers a comprehensive overview of current frameworks and emerging research directions. Future efforts are expected to focus on improving diagnostic precision and refining therapeutic strategies through optimized imaging techniques and AI algorithms, emphasizing international collaboration to drive innovation and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.