Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237885›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Emerging Advances in the Molecular Landscape of Penile Cancer and Their Implications for Precision Medicine.

Laura Elst, Kaat Vandermaesen, Maarten Albersen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura ElstCenter for Cancer Biology, Laboratory of Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-8762
Kaat VandermaesenCenter for Cancer Biology, Laboratory of Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5212-5020
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. maarten.albersen@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-6586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPenile cancer is a rare but aggressive malignancy, characterized by early lymphatic spread which is the most critical prognostic factor. Treatment options for patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease are limited, primarily relying on cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which is characterized by high toxicity and early resistance. In recent years, there has been a growing interest on translational research exploring the tumor microenvironment, enabling the identification of novel potential therapeutic targets. Emerging preclinical evidence supports the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates and novel exploratory therapies targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor associated macrophages, as well as their combinations. However, robust phase III trials investigating such therapies are currently lacking. A deeper understanding of the penile cancer immune landscape and the role of specific mutations in carcinogenesis, might lead to the development of novel combination strategies to overcome cisplatin resistance and disease progression, and to a better selection of patients for inclusion in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Penile NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Immune microenvironmentPenile squamous cell carcinomaPersonalized treatmentTP53 mutations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.