ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Non-adherence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors reduces overall and progression-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy improve survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR + /HER2-) breast cancer (BC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate CDK4/6i adherence, factors associated with non-adherence, the impact of health-system specialty pharmacy on adherence, and effects of non-adherence on survival outcomes in HR + /HER2- BC patients.
methodsData was collected from Houston Methodist Hospital System (HM) from HR + /HER2- BC patients with medication fill history utilizing electronic medical records. CDK4/6i adherence was calculated using the mean possession ratio ≥ 80%. Multivariable logistic regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were utilized to evaluate factors associated with non-adherence and its impact on survival, respectively.
resultsA total of 121 patients were assessed and analyzed; 55% patients received abemaciclib, 40% were on palbociclib, and 4% were on ribociclib. More patients were on aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen (79%) than fulvestrant (21%). Most of the patients were Caucasian (64%), non-Hispanic or Latino (84%), and postmenopausal (66%). Overall, 52 patients (43%) were non-adherent. Patients ≥ 65 years of age (OR: 0.304, [95% CI: 0.110-0.840], P-value: 0.022) and those of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (OR: 0.291, [95% CI: 0.086-0.985], P-value: 0.047) were more likely to be non-adherent to CDK4/6i. Non-adherence to CDK4/6i was associated with worse overall survival and progression-free survival.
conclusion43% patients were non-adherent to CDK4/6i. Older patients and those of Hispanic ethnicity were more likely to be non-adherent. Non-adherent patients had worse survival outcomes, highlighting the unmet need to implement interventions to improve CDK4/6i adherence in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40237878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.