ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025
Current Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension with and Without Papilledema: A Comparative Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- How to diagnose papilloedema.Practical neurology · 2026Review
- A call to develop rigorous standards for excellence in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: RISE-IIH.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Stenting versus shunting in sight-threatening idiopathic intracranial hypertension: genuine equipoise.Practical neurology · 2026Review
- Serum and CSF neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Long-term headaches in children with idiopathic intracranial hypertension-a 10 years follow-up.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Ventriculoperitoneal shunt versus transverse sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Idiopathic CSF dynamic disturbances causing headache: a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Neuro-Ophthalmological Disorders Associated with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDevelopment of safe targeted therapies for idiopathic intracranial hypertension requires a thorough understanding of recent evidence discovering the pathophysiology of the condition. The aim is to provide a review of studies that inform on the underpinning mechanisms that have been associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. RECENT
findingsPeople living with active idiopathic intracranial hypertension and obesity have been found to have with insulin resistance, hyperleptinaemia, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Clinically their adipose tissue is predominantly located in the truncal region and on detailed laboratory analysis the cells are primed for weight gain. There is evidence of androgen excess, altered glucocorticoid regulation and changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines. There are distinct alterations in metabolic pathways found in serum, urine and cerebrospinal fluid, that resolve following disease remission. These findings are associated with raised intracranial pressure and are likely secondary to cerebrospinal fluid hypersecretion. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension has a profile of systemic metabolic changes, endocrine dysfunction and cardiovascular risk profile distinct from that associated with obesity alone. These systemic metabolic changes are likely to contribute to dysregulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, primarily hypersecretion but with a possible additional effect of reduced clearance resulting in the core feature of raised intracranial pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.