ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Effect of Serial Intralesional Steroid Injections on Risk of Recurrence in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07654517 (A Phase I Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Response to In-Office Steroid Injections for Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- In Reference to In-Office Steroid Injections for Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Effect of Serial Intralesional Steroid Injections on Risk of Recurrence in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSerial intralesional steroid injections (ILSIs) have been suggested to be an effective adjunct treatment for idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) by maintaining airway patency and extending inter-surgical intervals. However, evidence for the effectiveness of serial ILSIs remains inconclusive. The current study aimed to assess whether ILSIs reduce the risk of subsequent surgical dilation (i.e., recurrence) in a cohort of patients with iSGS.
methodsProspectively collected clinical data for 75 female iSGS patients with 1-4 years of follow-up were analyzed. To assess the effect of ILSI use on the risk of recurrence, we assessed both the time-to-first recurrence using a standard Cox proportional hazards model and all recurrences per patient using a recurrent-events model. Overall, there were 36 patients who had received ILSIs at any point in the follow-up period and 39 patients who had not.
resultsILSI use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrence in both time-to-first event (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.49) and recurrent events (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.75) multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, along with older age at diagnosis and longer time since diagnosis (all p < 0.05). In the time-to-first event analysis, the median time to recurrence among those who had received ILSIs was 2.5 years compared to 1.4 years among those who had not. The number needed to treat with ILSIs to avoid one recurrence by 2 years follow-up was two.
conclusionSerial ILSIs were associated with reduced risk of recurrence, along with older age at diagnosis and longer time since diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.