Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237458›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025

A 3D-printed Sanger sequencing activity addresses student misconceptions.

Phillip E Brown, Stefanie H Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phillip E BrownBiotechnology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9213-6639
Stefanie H ChenBiotechnology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9550-971X

Funding

Molecular Biotechnology Laboratory Education Modules (MBLEM)R25GM130528 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GOLLER, CARLOS C, KELLY, ROBERT M · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM130528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of Sanger sequencing can be a challenging and unintuitive concept for students to master. In order to improve student learning, we developed a hands-on Sanger sequencing activity using 3D-printed models to incorporate tactile learning. These 3D models and the accompanying activity demonstrate the differences between gene amplification polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing, including the purpose and function of dNTPs and ddNTPs, both in terms of building and terminating the chain and in how the DNA sequence is read. After completing the activity, students self-reported high levels of both learning and enjoyment from the activity. Students were also asked to discuss what misconceptions they had prior to this activity that were addressed and provide suggestions for improving this activity. A majority of the misconceptions are related to the function and differences between dNTPs and ddNTPs, with others related to the function of primers, the high-quality region of sequencing, and the purpose of DNA fragment sizes. Overall, student responses indicate that this activity was enjoyable, improved student learning, and addressed specific misconceptions regarding Sanger sequencing. The use of online dice rolling software or additional computational analysis was a common suggestion from students to improve this activity further in future semesters.

Indexed as

3D printinghands-onmisconceptionsmodelSanger sequencingtactileUniversal Design for Learning

Identifiers

PMID40237458
PMCPMC12369333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.