ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Dissecting autonomy in a resource-constrained setting: a descriptive qualitative study of women's decisions on the surgical treatment of early breast cancer in northern Sri Lanka.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer treatment is a contested space in which therapeutic decisions often collide with women's values and preferences. In northern Sri Lanka, mastectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) despite evidence of equivalent survival following breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. This study explores autonomy in decision-making among women with EBC who were eligible for BCS and underwent mastectomy in northern Sri Lanka. A descriptive qualitative study was carried out among 15 women referred for adjuvant therapy to Tellippalai Trail Cancer Hospital in Jaffna district after having a mastectomy for EBC. Participants were recruited between January and May 2022 until data saturation was reached. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed in Tamil, translated into English, coded using QDA Miner Lite software, and analysed thematically. Women's autonomy in EBC treatment decisions is limited by various factors in northern Sri Lanka. The hospital setting is not conducive to informed decision-making, and women do not receive sufficient information. Neither survival rates nor risks/benefits of the surgical options are discussed in a systematic way. Although many women appear to be satisfied with their involvement in decision-making, their decisions are guided by incomplete information and fears of spread/recurrence communicated by treating teams. In the absence of policies and protocols to support patient autonomy, women "choose" the more invasive option: mastectomy. While it behoves medical professionals to provide evidence-based information, governments and the global health community must support strengthening healthcare systems to advance women's health and rights in lower-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.