ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Supplementing Single-Arm Trials with External Control Arms-Evaluation of German Real-World Data.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contribution of Real-World Evidence for the Orphan Medicines Approvals in the European Union Between 2000 and 2025.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As single-arm trials (SATs) are increasingly used in pharmaceutical research, the validity of such study designs needs to be critically assessed. We characterize the feasibility of supplementing SATs with real-world data (RWD)-derived external control arms by determining the proportion of SATs on breast cancer and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) for which an external control arm based on RWD can be constructed. The main outcome measure is the number and percentage of trials for which all important eligibility criteria and at least one primary endpoint could be identified in one of five German RWD sources. We surveyed all SATs concerning breast cancer or ALS treatment registered in the European Union's clinical trial registers between 2004 and 2023. Ten out of 379 breast cancer SATs and 2 of 11 ALS SATs could feasibly be supplemented with RWD-derived external control arms, if all important eligibility criteria and a primary endpoint have to be identifiable in the RWD source. Ninety-three breast cancer trials had at least one outcome ascertainable in a RWD source, and 35 trials had all important eligibility criteria recorded in a RWD source. Nine ALS trials had at least one primary endpoint ascertainable in RWD sources, and 2 had all important eligibility criteria recorded in a RWD source. Our study shows that SATs with RWD-derived external control arms will rarely be suitable to establish treatment effects of medicines in the current setting for the investigated phenotypes and that SATs should be designed with limitations of the source of external controls in mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.