Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237217›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025

High Agreement Across Laboratories Between Different Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Protocols.

Stefan Bräuer, Maximilian Weber, Christian Deuschle, Kühlwein Julia, Luis Concha-Marambio, Alexander M Bernhardt, Vaibhavi Kadam, David Mengel, Wolfgang P Ruf, Jan Kassubek and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lifestyle medicine in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Stefan BräuerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2449-5530
Maximilian WeberDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian DeuschleDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Kühlwein JuliaGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ulm, Germany.
Luis Concha-MarambioAmprion, San Diego, California, USA.
Alexander M BernhardtDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Vaibhavi KadamDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David MengelDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Wolfgang P RufGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ulm, Germany.
Jan KassubekGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-9270
Iñaki SchniewindGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.
Sandra KuhsGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Marcello RossiIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (ISNB), Bologna, Italy.
Piero ParchiIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (ISNB), Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9444-9524
Johannes LevinDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Karin M DanzerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ulm, Germany.
Matthis SynofzikDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-7273
Kathrin BrockmannDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Björn H FalkenburgerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-526X

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative ErkrankungenElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeed amplification assays (SAA) detect alpha-synuclein (aSYN) pathology in patient biomatrices such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-potentially even before clinical manifestations. As CSF-based SAA are approaching broader use in clinical trials and research, ensuring that different laboratories obtain the same results becomes increasingly important.

methodsIn this cross-laboratory, cross-aSYN-recombinant substrate and cross-protocol round-robin test, we compared SAA results from a common set of 38 CSF samples measured independently in four research laboratories of the German Center for Neurodegenerative diseases. Three laboratories (A-C) used an assay protocol adapted from Parchi's group at ISNB (Bologna, Italy); laboratory D used an assay protocol adapted from Amprion Inc. Two different manufacturers of aSYN protein were used as substrates for the SAA reaction.

resultsQualitative results were identical in at least three of the four laboratories for 37 out of 38 samples (20 positive, 17 negative). Fleiss Kappa for all four laboratories was 0.751 (z = 12, p < 0.001). For each laboratory, agreement with laboratory A was > 92%. For the number of positive replicates, Fleiss Kappa was 0.45 for a score of zero positive replicates and 0.42 for a score of four positive replicates.

conclusionsThe qualitative SAA results showed a high level of agreement across research laboratories, aSYN monomers, and assay protocols. Small differences between laboratories were systematic, consistent with the notion that SAA reports biologically relevant properties. These results also underline that round-robin tests can be helpful in assessing and ensuring SAA quality across laboratories.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinLaboratoriesHumansReproducibility of Resultsalpha-Synucleinalpha‐synucleinmethod validationproficiency testingring trialRT‐QuIC

Identifiers

PMID40237217
PMCPMC12000918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.