ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
High Agreement Across Laboratories Between Different Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Protocols.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Comparison of Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays for Increasing Reproducibility.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- CSF alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assay results in routine clinically collected samples.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of the α-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assay for Dementia With Lewy Bodies: A Comparison Across 4 Laboratories.Neurology · 2026Article
- Lifestyle medicine in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Alpha-synuclein seeding activity in postmortem tissues from patients with diffuse and isolated Lewy bodies.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Prions and protein aggregates as pathogens, self-propagating structures, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- α-Synuclein purification significantly impacts seed amplification assay performance and consistency.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeed amplification assays (SAA) detect alpha-synuclein (aSYN) pathology in patient biomatrices such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-potentially even before clinical manifestations. As CSF-based SAA are approaching broader use in clinical trials and research, ensuring that different laboratories obtain the same results becomes increasingly important.
methodsIn this cross-laboratory, cross-aSYN-recombinant substrate and cross-protocol round-robin test, we compared SAA results from a common set of 38 CSF samples measured independently in four research laboratories of the German Center for Neurodegenerative diseases. Three laboratories (A-C) used an assay protocol adapted from Parchi's group at ISNB (Bologna, Italy); laboratory D used an assay protocol adapted from Amprion Inc. Two different manufacturers of aSYN protein were used as substrates for the SAA reaction.
resultsQualitative results were identical in at least three of the four laboratories for 37 out of 38 samples (20 positive, 17 negative). Fleiss Kappa for all four laboratories was 0.751 (z = 12, p < 0.001). For each laboratory, agreement with laboratory A was > 92%. For the number of positive replicates, Fleiss Kappa was 0.45 for a score of zero positive replicates and 0.42 for a score of four positive replicates.
conclusionsThe qualitative SAA results showed a high level of agreement across research laboratories, aSYN monomers, and assay protocols. Small differences between laboratories were systematic, consistent with the notion that SAA reports biologically relevant properties. These results also underline that round-robin tests can be helpful in assessing and ensuring SAA quality across laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.