Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237179›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A neurocomputational account of the link between social perception and social action.

Lisa M Bas, Ian D Roberts, Cendri A Hutcherson, Anita Tusche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa M Bas *Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-0059
Ian D Roberts *Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.
Cendri A Hutcherson *Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-4809
Anita Tusche *Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4180-8447

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-04329NIMH NIH HHS Conte Center P50 MH094258NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 435-2016-1274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People selectively help others based on perceptions of their merit or need. Here, we develop a neurocomputational account of how these social perceptions translate into social choice. Using a novel fMRI social perception task, we show that both merit and need perceptions recruited the brain's social inference network. A behavioral computational model identified two non-exclusive mechanisms underlying variance in social perceptions: a consistent tendency to perceive others as meritorious/needy (bias) and a propensity to sample and integrate normative evidence distinguishing high from low merit/need in other people (sensitivity). Variance in people's merit (but not need) bias and sensitivity independently predicted distinct aspects of altruism in a social choice task completed months later. An individual's merit

Indexed as

BrainSocial BehaviorSocial PerceptionAdultAltruismComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultaltruismdrift-diffusion modelfMRIhumanmentalizingneurosciencesocial inferencessocial perception

Identifiers

PMID40237179
PMCPMC12002797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.