Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237162›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of food safety2025

Set-up and validation of end-point polymerase chain reaction for the detection of edible insect DNA -

Giulia Magagna, Serena Pederzani, Michela Tilola, Marina Nadia Losio, Virginia Filipello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia MagagnaFood Safety Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia. giulia.magagna@izsler.it.
Serena PederzaniDepartment of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics (DICATAM), University of Brescia. s.pederzani002@studenti.unibs.it.
Michela TilolaFood Safety Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia. michela.tilola@izsler.it.
Marina Nadia LosioFood Safety Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia. marinanadia.losio@izsler.it.
Virginia FilipelloFood Safety Department, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Brescia. virginia.filipello@izsler.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects offer an alternative protein supply for both animal and human consumption. Recently, companies in Europe have begun insect production for use in food and animal feed. Following Regulation (EU) No. 2015/2283, edible insects are classified under the novel food category and can be marketed and consumed within the European Union. As a result, methods of authentication are necessary to verify the compliance of these insect-based products. In this study, two end-point polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of the 16S rRNA gene of Acheta domesticus and Tenebrio molitor were fine-tuned and validated. The primer specificity was tested on insect samples, other animals, and plants, and the gene was amplified only in target samples. The limit of detection was evaluated using different food matrices contaminated with decreasing concentrations of insect powder and was below 0.05% (w/w).

Identifiers

PMID40237162
PMCPMC12406209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.