Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237147›Full record

ArticleDermatology reports2025

Grammatical approach to describing skin lesions: framework and assessment.

Adam Cardenas, Emilie A Foltz, Simi Cadmus, Dayna Diven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam CardenasUniversity of Texas, Dell Medical School, Austin (TX).
Emilie A FoltzWashington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane (WA).
Simi CadmusCentral Austin Dermatology & Aesthetics, Austin (TX).
Dayna DivenDivision of Dermatology, University of Texas, Dell Medical School, Austin (TX).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teaching the foundation of dermatology for non-dermatologists has proven difficult, especially in a compact undergraduate medical education system. This has consequently led to insufficient preparation of non-dermatologists, including primary care residents, to identify, describe, and manage skin conditions. We present a grammatical approach for learning and describing skin lesions that will provide an early, expandable framework built from easily digestible components. From results in our own institution, we hope this tool will empower trainees of all expertise and specialties to apply their knowledge at the bedside and aid in communication and collaboration with dermatology consultants when needed. Twenty-one first-year medical students at the University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School voluntarily completed our learning module with a pre- and post-survey, which recorded their confidence in verbally describing common skin lesions and formulating differential diagnoses. Among the respondents, 85.7% reported that the learning tool helped them better organize their descriptions of skin findings. There was a statistically significant increase in confidence after the learning tool for describing skin lesions (p<0.05) and formulating a differential diagnosis (p<0.05). These results suggest the grammatical approach improves the confidence of trainees by both describing skin lesions and formulating differential diagnoses based on the lesion's description.

Indexed as

education and/or curricular developmentlearning methodsLearning typesundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID40237147
PMCPMC12777939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.