Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237076›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.

Kia Radovanović, Anoek Lorskens, Sebastian Schütte, Juliane Bräuer, Josep Call, Daniel B M Haun, Edwin J C van Leeuwen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kia RadovanovićDepartment of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-1604-9121
Anoek LorskensDepartment of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sebastian SchütteDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Juliane BräuerDepartment for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena, Jena, Thüringen, Germany.
Josep CallSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Daniel B M HaunDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Edwin J C van LeeuwenDepartment of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequity aversion (IA) is the resistance to unequitable rewards given similar investments. It has been postulated as an important mechanism by which human cooperation thrives. To understand the evolutionary origin of human IA and its distribution across the animal kingdom, many species have been tested on IA, with mixed results. Whereas chimpanzees were originally found to show IA, more recent studies showed that their IA response could be explained by social disappointment. We conducted two studies on IA in bonobos using established paradigms: a token-exchange task and the social disappointment task. Bonobos could exchange tokens for equal or less-preferred food rewards than their partners (Study 1) and were tested with humans and machines to control for social disappointment effects (Study 2). We found that bonobos responded aversively to unequal food distributions in both studies, which was reflected by more refusals to participate when disadvantaged. Notably, and contrary to chimpanzees, this effect could not be explained by social disappointment, although Study 2 was only partially consistent with an IA explanation. Overall, our findings indicate that bonobos possess the sensitivity to recognize and respond to unfair treatment, which supports the notion that IA may have coevolved as a stabilizing mechanism for cooperation.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPan paniscusRewardAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleSocial Behaviorabstractbonobocomparative psychologycooperationinequity aversionsociality

Identifiers

PMID40237076
PMCPMC12001075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.