ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2025
Facial magnetomyography using an array of optically pumped magnetometers.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Measuring facial muscle activity is crucial in the diagnosis of facial palsy. This study investigated whether contactless Magnetomyography (MMG) using optically pumped magnetometers (OPM) is feasible for visualizing facial muscle activity. Methods: An anatomically shaped mask featuring eleven OPM was arranged on one side of the face of five healthy subjects. MMG was recorded while they performed different facial expressions. The root mean square of each OPM signal was calculated for each expression and subject and allocated to the individual face. Moreover, the maximum average muscle activity and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined. Results: The subjects' facial muscle activity could be measured individually per facial expression. Mean RMS was 0.6pT (SD 0.4pT), resulting in a mean SNR of 2.2 (SD 1.2). Conclusions: Imaging facial activity via MMG using OPM is possible, although the sensor positioning (sensor geometry and distance to the muscle) is decisive. However, the signal amplitude of the facial muscles is low and the interindividual anatomical variability renders the measurement setup challenging. Significance: As the imaging of facial MMG is feasible, this study paves the way for future studies using OPM for the diagnosis, monitoring, and rehabilitation of facial muscle and facial nerve disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.