ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2025
Updated meta‑analysis on the therapeutic effects of botanical extract interventions for chronic lower back pain.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) severely affects an individual's quality of life and increases reliance on healthcare services. Previous meta-analyses have primarily examined the effects of essential oils and herbal remedies separately, without considering their combined therapeutic potential. The present meta-analysis integrated both treatment modalities to evaluate the efficacy of botanical extract-based therapies for CLBP management. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, with data extracted from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted up to July 2024. A comprehensive search of several databases identified 13 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, focusing on interventions using plant extracts, including various herbal formulations and essential oils. The meta-analysis demonstrated that botanical extract-based treatments, whether applied topically, combined with massage or administered orally, were more effective compared with a placebo in reducing pain, enhancing lumbar flexibility and extending walking duration in patients with CLBP. These findings support the role of botanical extracts as viable therapeutic options for CLBP management, emphasizing their potential integration into comprehensive pain management strategies. However, further research is necessary to explore their long-term efficacy and underlying mechanisms. The present study is registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42024554015).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.