ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Narrative coherence in neural language models.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Strategic Prompting Scale (SPS) for Measuring Metacognitive Regulation in Human-AI Interaction.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural language models, although at first approximation they may be simply described as predictors of the next token in a given sequence, surprisingly exhibit linguistic behaviors akin to human ones. This suggests the existence of an underlying sophisticated cognitive system in language production. This intriguing circumstance has inspired the adoption of psychological theories as investigative tools and the present research falls within this line of inquiry. What we aim to establish is the potential existence of a core of coherent integration in language production, metaphorically parallel to a human speaker's personal identity. To investigate this, we employed a well-established psychological theory on narrative coherence in autobiographical stories. This theory offers the theoretical advantage of a strong correlation between narrative coherence and a high integrative level of the personal knowledge system. It also provides the empirical advantage of methodologies for quantifying coherence and its characteristic dimensions through the analysis of autobiographical texts. The same methodology was applied to 2010 autobiographical stories generated by GPT-3.5 and an equal number from GPT-4, elicited by asking the models to assume roles that included a variety of variables such as gender, mood, and age. The large number of stories ensures adequate sampling given the stochastic nature of the models, and was made possible thanks to the adoption of an automated coherence evaluation procedure. We initially asked the models to generate 192 autobiographical stories, which were then analyzed by a team of professional psychologists. Based on this sample, we constructed a training set for the fine-tuning of GPT-3.5 as an automatic evaluator. Our results from the 4020 autobiographical stories overall show a level of narrative coherence in the models fully in line with data on human subjects, with slightly higher values in the case of GPT-4. These results suggest a high level of knowledge unification in the models, comparable to the integration of the self in human beings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.