Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40236933›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2025

Why is the medical profession reluctant to talk about diet change?

Shireen Kassam, Laura-Jane Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shireen KassamKing's College Hospital, London, England.
Laura-Jane SmithKing's College Hospital, London, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intertwined crises of poor health, climate change, biodiversity loss and social injustice demand urgent action. Human activities, particularly fossil fuel use and the current food system, are key drivers of these crises. A transition to a plant-based diet, especially within healthcare systems, offers a significant opportunity to address these challenges. Diets high in animal products and ultra-processed foods are leading causes of chronic ill health and environmental degradation, while plant-based diets reduce greenhouse gas emissions, conserve biodiversity and promote human health. Evidence shows that plant-based diets can prevent and manage conditions such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer, while addressing global food insecurity and resource inefficiency. Healthcare systems, such as the NHS, can lead this transition by offering plant-based meals, promoting education and advocating for policy changes. Embracing plant-based diets is now an ethical imperative, with benefits spanning individual health, environmental sustainability, equitable resource distribution and global health justice.

Indexed as

Diet changeFoodNutritionPlant-basedVegan

Identifiers

PMID40236933
PMCPMC11998298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.