Effects of virtual reality with different modalities on upper limb recovery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis on optimizing stroke rehabilitation.

Background: As a major cause of disability worldwide, stroke affects about 80% of survivors with upper limb (UL) motor dysfunction, significantly impairing their quality of life. Virtual reality (VR) has been recognized as an innovative rehabilitation tool; however, the effectiveness of VR systems with different immersion modalities is still uncertain. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of intervention measures, including non-immersive gaming consoles, immersive VR (IVR), non-immersive VR (NIVR), and conventional therapy (CT) on upper limb motor function in stroke rehabilitation. Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to 12 June 2024. UL motor recovery was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FMUE) scale. The NMA was performed using the Bayesian approach with the BUGSnet package in R software to calculate the relative effectiveness of each intervention. Results: 34 RCTs involving 1,704 participants were included. Among non-immersive gaming systems, Microsoft Kinect demonstrated the greatest effective in enhancing UL motor function, followed by Nintendo Wii, then NIVR and IVR head-mounted devices. CT showed the least effective. Specifically, Microsoft Kinect significantly improved FMUE scores (mean difference [MD] = 7.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 13.77, Conclusion: Non-immersive gaming console of Microsoft Kinect is the most effective intervention for improving UL motor function in stroke survivors. In contrast, IVR head-mounted devices did not offer significant advantages over CT. These findings suggest that non-immersive gaming consoles of Microsoft Kinect could be a more cost-effective and accessible alternative for stroke rehabilitation.