Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40236889›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

Partial Submandibular Gland Resection With Ultrasonic Dissector vs Electrocautery.

Hallie Buckner, Anil R Shah

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hallie Buckner
Anil R Shah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The superficial aspect of the submandibular gland can be removed to improve the aesthetic appearance of the face and neck. This study describes a novel surgical technique to resect part of the submandibular gland during a deep neck or facelift. Objectives: Describe the technique to remove the superficial lobe of the submandibular gland using an ultrasonic dissector. Analyze the association between the uses of ultrasonic technology and reduced postoperative complications. Compare rates of postoperative complications between standard electrocautery and ultrasonic dissection. Methods: Experimental and control groups were established. A Sonicision ultrasonic dissector (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) was used for resection in the experimental group, whereas electrocautery was used for resection in the control group. Postoperative outcomes of neuropraxia, hematoma, seroma, and sialocele formation were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher's exact test in RStudio. Results: Control patients ( Conclusions: This novel technique has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of partial submandibular gland resection. However, a follow-up study with a greater sample size and without confounding variables, such as intraoperative injection of Botulinum toxin, is necessary. Level of Evidence 3: (Therapeutic).

Identifiers

PMID40236889
PMCPMC11997774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.