ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Spine surgeon conflict of interest disclosure discrepancies between a national conference and the open payments database.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring ethical elements in reporting guidelines: results from a research-on-research study.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Financial relationships between physicians and the medical device industry are common. These relationships can potentially influence research, education, and patient care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inconsistencies between physician disclosures and the Open Payments database for a national spine conference. Methods: Disclosures of participants in the 2023 North American Spine Society (NASS) conferences were compared with the Open Payments database. Discrepancies were noted whenever a participant had a company listing on their Open Payments page that was not reported in their disclosure in the NASS Disclosure Index. Simple statistics were reported as a frequency and percentage for categorical variables, and median and interquartile range (IQR) were used for continuous variables. Pearson correlations were run to investigate associations between the number of reportable companies, the number of discrepancies, and general payment amounts. Results: A total of 432 participants met the inclusion criteria, with the majority having discrepancies between their self-reported disclosures and the Open Payments database (84.2%, N=364/432). Regarding surgeons with a discrepancy, 80.2% (N=292/364) failed to report payments of less than 1,000 USD. Physicians affiliated with a larger number of reportable companies were associated with an increased number of discrepancies (p<.001, Conclusions: Discrepancy rates between what surgeons disclosed at NASS 2023 and what companies reported to Open Payments were high. However, the majority of these discrepancies that the physicians failed to report were low in value, falling below 1,000 USD. As a potential means to mitigate these discrepancies, it is imperative that physicians review their Open Payments page prior to disclosure submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.